5 Simple Techniques For case law on gift in cash
5 Simple Techniques For case law on gift in cash
Blog Article
Extra username and password are expected for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
۔۔۔۔واقعاتی شہادت فوجداری قانون مین درجہ بندی کے لھاظ سے کمزور حیثیت رکھتی ہے۔۔۔ جب تک واقعاتی شہادت کی تمام کڑیاں اس طریقے سے فراہم نہ کی گءی ہوں کہ ایک متواتر زنجیر کی شکل اختیار کرے اور مقتول اور قاتل کے درمیان نہ ٹوٹنے والا سلسلہ قاءم کرے تب تک سزاےموت یا تعزیری سزا /عمر قید کسی کو دینا انصاف کے اصولوں کے منافی ہے۔
4. It's been noticed by this Court that there can be a delay of one day during the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained from the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness on the alleged occurrence and also the prosecution is depending on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession in the petitioners continues to be tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram happened for being the real brothers in the deceased but they did not respond in the least on the confessional statements in the petitioners and calmly observed them leaving, one after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glimpse much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is no explanation regarding why her arrest was not effected after making on the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on numerous instances that extra judicial confession of an accused is often a weak variety of evidence which may be manoeuvred through the prosecution in almost any case where direct connecting evidence does not arrive their way. The prosecution is usually counting on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word regarding presence of some light within the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners with each other over a motorcycle at 4.
Information on accessing opinions and case-related documents with the Supreme Court with the United States is accessible within the court’s website.
94 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually properly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 times. If your appeal is just not decided within that timeframe, he/she can then approach the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the ninety days with the department to act has already expired. To the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided because of the decision on the Supreme Court in the case of Dr.
The case addresses a range of issues including, environmental protection, and an expansive interpretation of the right to life.
only about the ground of miscases remanded & only over the ground of misreading of evidence only within the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)
Extra username and password are required for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
13. The Supreme Court has held that when the act of misconduct is set up as well as employee is found guilty after owing process of law, it's the prerogative on the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, from the varied penalties provided in legislation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed is not really proportionate with the seriousness on the act of misconduct is not enough even so the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion in a structured and lawful method. Read more
acquitted the appellants from each of the charges therefore the same is dismissed being infructuous. (Criminal Revision )
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, would be the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It involves the execution of your convicted person to be a consequence of their crime.
She did note that the boy still needed in depth therapy in order to cope with his abusive past, and “to reach the point of being Safe and sound with other children.” The boy was getting counseling with a DCFS therapist. Again, the court approved in the actions.
A reduced court might not rule against a binding precedent, regardless of whether it feels that it's unjust; it may well only express the hope that a higher court or even the legislature will reform the rule in question. If the court believes that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and needs to evade it and help the regulation evolve, it could both hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, get more info or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts of the cases; some jurisdictions allow for your judge to recommend that an appeal be completed.
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to determine a commission of internationally known and recognized experts to review and rule on upcoming grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power traces.